<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Entries tagged 'majority vote'</title>
		<description>Blog Entries tagged 'majority vote'</description>
		<link>http://www.cfozone.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:04:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Director compensation nearly flat</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Director-compensation-nearly-flat.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>    &lt;p&gt;Is the director gravy train finally slowing down? It sure seems like it.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;For one thing, Towers Watson&amp;#39;s annual analysis of director compensation at Fortune 500 companies found that 2009 pay packages for directors rose by a mere 1 percent over 2008 levels. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;That is smaller than the median increase of 3 percent directors received in 2008.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The consulting firm points out that prior to the global economic crisis, directors had been steadily receiving annual pay incr [...]</description>
			<author>stephentaub@yahoo.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Towers Watson</category>
 <category>proxy access</category>
 <category>majority vote</category>
 <category>compensation</category>
 <category>Cash</category>
 <category>Careers/Management</category>
 <category>broker votes</category>
 <category>board of directors</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Congress punts on proxy access</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Congress-punts-on-proxy-access.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>    &lt;p&gt;When the going gets tough, Congress punts.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s what it did with Proxy Access. Although the financial reform bill contains a number of provisions that no doubt irk regulation opponents in general-such as the curbs on proprietary trading and the creation of the consumer protection board-when it came to corporate governance, Congress cowered to the interests of the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;There is no majority voting provision for directors even  [...]</description>
			<author>stephentaub@yahoo.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Sen. Chris Dodd</category>
 <category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category>
 <category>Risk Metrics</category>
 <category>proxy access</category>
 <category>majority vote</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Financial bill to exclude majority voting provision</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Financial-bill-to-exclude-majority-voting-provision.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>    &lt;p&gt;So much for shareholders gaining much more say over the Board of Directors.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It looks like the financial overhaul bill being hammered out by Senate and House conferees will exclude one critical earlier proposal and include a greatly watered down version of another.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;According to RiskMetrics, Senator Christopher Dodd, the lead Senate negotiator, said conferees had agreed to drop a provision to require public companies to have a majority voting threshold in uncontested directo [...]</description>
			<author>stephentaub@yahoo.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>US Chamber of Commerce</category>
 <category>proxy access</category>
 <category>majority vote</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>christopher cox</category>
 <category>Business Roundtable</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Senators want to block majority vote and proxy access</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Senators-want-to-block-majority-vote-and-proxy-access.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;With all the attention being paid to derivatives reform and consumer protection in the financial reform bill, some new amendments seem largely to have slipped under the radar. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m talking about amendments recently introduced by Sen. Thomas Carper (D-Delaware) to remove the proxy access and majority voting provisions from the Restoring American Financial Stability Act. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the moment, the act affirms the SEC&amp;#39;s authority to issue a proxy acces rule, although it doesn&amp;#39;t [...]</description>
			<author>annearf@aol.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Sen. Thomas Carper</category>
 <category>restoring american financial stability act</category>
 <category>proxy access</category>
 <category>majority vote</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>