<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Entries tagged 'bailout'</title>
		<description>Blog Entries tagged 'bailout'</description>
		<link>http://www.cfozone.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:04:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>AIG vs. Goldman reveals the flaw in financial reform</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=AIG-vs.-Goldman-reveals-the-flaw-in-financial-reform.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The latest revelations &amp;nbsp;concerning the dispute between AIG and Goldman over collateral show how weak the new financial reform package really is. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After all, Goldman&amp;#39;s demands for collateral from AIG as it was failing ended up costing taxpayers billions of dollars. Yet according to the testimony today during the crisis panel&amp;#39;s latest hearings, the whole question hinged on what constituted fair value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;To hear Goldman CFO David Viniar tell it, the Vampire Squid can [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>Goldman Sachs</category>
 <category>GAAP</category>
 <category>financial reform bill</category>
 <category>financial market reform</category>
 <category>financial crisis</category>
 <category>FASB</category>
 <category>derivatives</category>
 <category>credit default swaps</category>
 <category>Congress</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>banking reform</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>bank failures</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
 <category>AIG</category>
 <category>Accounting</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>French, German banks most exposed to Greek crisis</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=French-German-banks-most-exposed-to-Greece-crisis.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Large French and German banks appear to be the largest creditors to Greece and therefore stand to benefit the most from the 110 billion euros rescue  package to Greece, at least indirectly since Greece won&amp;#39;t default on its debt.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;French financial institutions have the largest exposure in the world to Greek  debt, holding about 50 billion euros of Greek debt, both from the private and  public sectors. &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;The most exposed bank is Credit Agricole, which has more than 25 billio [...]</description>
			<author>marinecole@hotmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>IMF</category>
 <category>Greece</category>
 <category>European Union</category>
 <category>debt</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lumbering EU giant awakes</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Lumbering-EU-giant-awakes.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The European Union has finally stepped up to the plate with a bailout package for member states - after months and months of hemming and hawing - and it only took the potential bottoming out of the euro and fears of another global panic to light a fire. Never mind troubles in Greece since last November, never mind Ireland, or the UK, or Portugal or Spain. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The bailout package agreed by EU finance ministers early this morning will supply countries in [...]</description>
			<author>denise.bedell@tc-worldwide.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>liquidity</category>
 <category>IMF</category>
 <category>eurozone</category>
 <category>European Union</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Treasury votes to keep KPMG as Citi’s auditor</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Treasury-votes-to-keep-KPMG-as-Citia-s-auditor.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>        &lt;p&gt;Submitted by Francine McKenna, republished from Going Concern, Accounting News for Accountants and CFOs.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The US Treasury recently decided to vote its proportionate ownership interest in Citigroup to affirm reappointment of KPMG as Citi&amp;#39;s auditor for the 41st consecutive year.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Maybe Treasury married KPMG all over again because they&amp;#39;re cheap compared to what Goldman and AIG are paying PwC.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Maybe KPMG knows this client best - a dubious honor. KPMG has been [...]</description>
			<author>jobs@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>treasury</category>
 <category>KPMG</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>Citigroup</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
 <category>audit</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Financial innovation inevitably leads to crisis, says new research</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Financial-innovation-inevitably-leads-to-crisis-says-new-research.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Krugman&amp;#39;s column today called my attention to a paper that anyone interested in financial reform should check out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The paper completely contradicts the conventional wisdom that innovation in finance is a good thing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indeed, the authors, including a&amp;nbsp;behavioral finance theorist who has long challenged the &amp;quot;rational expectations&amp;quot; school (whose assumptions produced that so-called wisdom), say innovation inevitably leads to financial crisis built on what amount [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Worldcom</category>
 <category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category>
 <category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>innovation</category>
 <category>Goldman Sachs</category>
 <category>Fed</category>
 <category>Enron</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>banking reform</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>bank failures</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fed’s Bear Stearns assets rotten in more than one way</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Feda-s-Bear-Stearns-assets-rotten-in-more-than-one-way.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The New York Federal Reserve has finally disclosed the assets it holds as a result of its bailout of Bear Stearns&amp;#39; creditors. And, as expected, it&amp;#39;s not a very pretty portfolio.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Most of Maiden Lane 1, the vehicle used to absorb the assets, is made of jumbo mortgages, collateralized debt obligations and commercial real estate assets, all of which are impairing the Fed&amp;#39;s balance sheet -- and its reputation, as Bloomberg noted Thursday.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s not to say the whole t [...]</description>
			<author>marinecole@hotmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Federal Reserve</category>
 <category>credit default swap</category>
 <category>Bear Stearns</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Banks still gun shy when it comes to lending</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Banks-still-gun-shy-when-it-comes-to-lending.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>                  &lt;p&gt;There have been many attempts to call a bottom to credit quality. Much time has been spent scouring through bank filings, combing over charge-off data. The thinking -- or hope, at least -- is that once credit quality stabilizes banks will fully get back into the business of banking. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But, as American Banker reports, executives at major banks are pretty comfortable with how their loan books are performing -- and they still don&amp;#39;t plan to start doling out more money [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>lending</category>
 <category>Credit</category>
 <category>Cash</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Citi continues to make nice</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Citi-continues-to-make-nice.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>        &lt;p&gt;I wrote about it before, but it&amp;#39;s worth mentioning again: Nobody plays nicer with the government than Citigroup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While American International Group is just starting to fully appreciate  all the nice things the US taxpayer has done for it, Citi, which is 27 percent owned by Uncle Sam, has always gotten it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In testimony before a bailout oversight panel on Thursday, the bank&amp;#39;s CEO, Vikram Pandit, voiced support for Obama administration financial reform goals, includi [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>compliance</category>
 <category>Citigroup</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AIG counterparties got more than 100 cents on the dollar</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=AIG-counterparties-got-more-than-100-cents-on-the-dollar.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since the Federal Reserve bailed out AIG in late 2008, the true significance of the so-called Maiden Lane III component of the deal has escaped me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For those new to my horribly &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; interest in the Fed, the bank set up vehicles called Maiden Lane to hold the assets it bought from a number of bailed-out institutions, evidently thinking that parking dodgy assets in vehicles named after one of those dark and windy little streets in the downtown Manhattan shadows of the [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Societe Generale</category>
 <category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>Goldman Sachs</category>
 <category>Federal Reserve</category>
 <category>Fed</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>BlackRock</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
 <category>AIG</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Geithner gets to have it both ways</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Geithner-gets-to-have-it-both-ways.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Matt Quinn and I are struck by the contradiction at the heart of Tim Geithner&amp;#39;s stated role in the bailout of AIG when he was president of the New York Fed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the one hand, Geithner claims he had very little to do with it, and so isn&amp;#39;t responsible for the fact that the bank failed to use its leverage to negotiate better terms for taxpayers instead of paying Goldman Sachs and other AIG counterparties 100 cents on the dollar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, his claim today is limited to the disclosur [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Paul Volcker</category>
 <category>Obama Administration</category>
 <category>Geithner</category>
 <category>Federal Reserve</category>
 <category>Fed</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
 <category>AIG</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Banks' case against the TARP tax doesn't stand a chance</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Banks-case-against-the-TARP-tax-doesnt-stand-a-chance.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;This New York times article on the bank lobby&amp;#39;s plans to challenge the constitutionality of the bank tax proposed by the Obama administration last week fails to point out several clear-cut historical precedents in support of it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, the article notes that legal experts say the challenge rests on shaky ground, but it never really explains why.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And it&amp;#39;s not because taxes aren&amp;#39;t &amp;quot;punishment,&amp;quot; as the reporter suggests. Instead, it&amp;#39;s because taxes of this so [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Tax</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>reform</category>
 <category>Obama Administration</category>
 <category>Fees</category>
 <category>compliance</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New York Fed: You said what over email?</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=New-York-Fed-You-said-what-over-email-.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>        &lt;p&gt;One of the big stories today is the emails between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and American International Group in which the regulator told the insurer to withhold details from public filings about certain payments it made to banks during the crisis.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Bloomberg reports : &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;AIG said in a draft of a regulatory filing that the insurer paid banks, which included Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Societe Generale SA, 100 cents on the dollar for credit-default swaps  [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>New York Fed</category>
 <category>Goldman Sachs</category>
 <category>filings</category>
 <category>emails</category>
 <category>disclosure</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
 <category>AIG</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shocking news: Banks outsmart Treasury</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Shocking-news-Banks-outsmart-Treasury.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>                        &lt;p&gt;A good story over on Bloomberg  about how some big banks that received huge bailouts piled into illiquid mortgage debt ahead of a government program designed to purge bank balance sheets of the frozen assets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs added a combined $3.36 billion of home-loan bonds that lack government guarantees to their short-term trading assets during the third quarter, up 16 percent from the second quarter, Bloomberg found [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>treasury</category>
 <category>illiquid assets</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Risk begets risk, IMF finds</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Risk-begets-risk-IMF-finds.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The results of this study by the International Monetary Fund would be funny if they weren&amp;#39;t so scary: The more risk financial firms take, the more they spend lobbying against regulation,&amp;nbsp;the study finds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using detailed information on lobbying and mortgage lending activities, the authors found&amp;nbsp;that lenders lobbying more on issues related to mortgage lending have higher loan-to-income ratios, securitize more intensively, and have&amp;nbsp;faster growing portfolios. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They s [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Regulation</category>
 <category>reform</category>
 <category>recovery</category>
 <category>Obama Administration</category>
 <category>Federal Reserve</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good money after bad: GMAC getting another $3.8 billion</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Good-money-after-bad-GMAC-getting-another-3.5-billion.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>        &lt;p&gt;Reports on Wednesday indicated GMAC is about to get another $3.8 billion  from the Treasury Department. That will bring its total bailout to $16 billion, which is the equivalent of nearly 9 percent of all GMAC&amp;#39;s assets.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;We can be breathless over the tens of billions received by Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs and others. But those banks are very, very big. And the funds they received, proportionately, are nothing compared to  [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>GMAC</category>
 <category>failure</category>
 <category>bankruptcy</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fannie, Freddie and a FUBAR financial system</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Fannie-Freddie-and-a-FUBAR-financial-system.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The back and forth over the apparent lifting of any limit on government capital available to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shows no sign of ending, as the blogosphere seems to be trying to fill in the blanks left by the Treasury&amp;#39;s cryptic Christmas Eve announcement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It still looks to us as if the announcement amounts to an acknowledgement that the housing market is still in serious trouble, as the governmental blank check for the two agencies came only days before Fannie reported that  [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category>
 <category>Goldman Sachs</category>
 <category>Citigroup</category>
 <category>Bear Stearns</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>Bank of America</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fresh funds for Fannie and Freddie show housing still needs help</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Fresh-funds-for-Fannie-and-Freddie-show-housing-still-needs-help.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I wasn&amp;#39;t sure what to make of some of the rumblings in the blogosphere over the disclosure on Christmas Eve that the Treasury had extended fresh capital to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting timing, for sure. The Treasury clearly wanted to minimize the bad press that would attend the news. But the timing&amp;nbsp;only got the tin foil atop the heads of the more advanced theorists flashing away big time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still,&amp;nbsp;it seems there might be&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;relatively straightforwar [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>recovery</category>
 <category>recession</category>
 <category>Obama Administration</category>
 <category>Fannie Mae</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The bank bailout disconnect</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=The-bank-bailout-disconnect.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>        &lt;p&gt;A blogger over at Zero Hedge  seems as perplexed as I am over how easy it&amp;#39;s been for banks that nearly brought the global economy to its knees to raise capital.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Investors are clearly clamoring to hold bank equity, as shocking as that might seem. You can thank the Federal Reserve&amp;#39;s near-zero interest rate policy in part for that by once again making it look easy to borrow cheap and lend high.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;If the clients want something, give it to them in spades, whether  [...]</description>
			<author>mquinn@cfozone.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>fat cat bankers</category>
 <category>cost of capital</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernanke vs. the bank lobby?</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=Bernanke-vs.-the-bank-lobby-.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;How can the Senate vote to confirm Ben Bernanke when he gives an answer like this on the question of moral hazard?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After all, the question wasn&amp;#39;t limited to its existence but to its growing importance, as other central bankers have come to realize, including the one who now describes the vicious cycle of bailouts and risk taking, where&amp;nbsp;more of&amp;nbsp;one leads to more of the other,&amp;nbsp;as a &amp;quot;doom loop.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, the Fed chairman says more power to the Fed will take  [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>Federal Reserve</category>
 <category>Congress</category>
 <category>Banking</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More questions for Tim Geithner</title>
			<link>http://www.cfozone.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=More-questions-for-Tim-Geithner.html&amp;Itemid=713</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;This interview with Tim Geithner strikes me as a hugely wasted opportunity. In fairness, the Q&amp;amp;A format doesn&amp;#39;t lend itself to penetrating insight. Yet surely the interviewer, Daniel Gross, should have asked a follow-up on one answer that was really a non-answer to a key question, and asked another that went sorely begging. (Full disclosure, I worked with Gross on three occasions at CFO Magazine.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, Gross asked Geithner whether the financial industry was too large. And Geit [...]</description>
			<author>ronaldfink6@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>Risk</category>
 <category>Regulation</category>
 <category>reform</category>
 <category>recovery</category>
 <category>Obama Administration</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>bonuses</category>
 <category>Banks</category>
 <category>bailout</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>