topleft
topright

Login or Register


Red-Hot Thread

"The corporate brand is not only used to improve competitive positioning and express company aspirations, it can also be a powerful tool to motivate employees."

Latest Forum Posts

in Deal Talk by Brayn, 29-07-10 19:17
in Your Career by pvarga, 28-07-10 00:37
in Your Career by SherylNash01, 27-07-10 23:48
Whole Foods investors to vote on board removal rule Print E-mail
Monday, 08 March 2010

(Reuters) - Whole Foods Market investors will vote on Monday on a proposal that would make it easier for shareholders to oust a director whose conduct they deem inappropriate.

The shareholder resolution from Amalgamated Bank's LongView Funds would roll back a bylaw change that Whole Foods directors put in place a few months after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission closed an investigation into the online chat activities of Chairman and Chief Executive John Mackey in April 2008.

The proposal before the company's annual meeting in Vancouver seeks a bylaw change to permit shareholders to remove a director either "with or without cause." The bylaws now require that a cause be given.

"The ability for shareholders to remove a director with or without cause helps investors promote accountability among our elected directors," said Scott Zdrazil, director of corporate governance for Amalgamated Bank, whose LongView Fund holds 66,830 Whole Foods shares.

Whole Foods' board unanimously recommended that investors vote against the proposal from Amalgamated.

The SEC probe centered on Mackey's anonymous comments on a Yahoo financial chat forum from 1999 to 2006 in which he trumpeted Whole Foods' performance while disparaging then-rival Wild Oats Markets Inc. Whole Foods bought Wild Oats for $565 million in 2007. The SEC ultimately decided to take no action against Whole Foods and Mackey.

Amalgamated said Whole Foods' board "unilaterally and without advance notice to shareholders" changed the bylaws in August 2008 to limit shareholders' power to remove directors only in situations where there was cause.

That change narrowly defined "cause" as covering only a criminal indictment or a judicial finding that a director had breached his or her fiduciary duties to the company or was not capable of performing a director's responsibility, the proposal said.

Representatives from Austin, Texas-based Whole Foods were not immediately available for additional comment.

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. "Reuters" and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 




Market Data



Copyright © 2009-2010 CFOZone. All rights reserved. CFOZone is a property of Professional Social Networks, Inc.